ISSN 2979-8582 · Article No. 029
Ikhlas Ahmad: Faculty of Education, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
Mohammad Zafar Ayat: Department of Management Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Rabiya Khatoon: Department of Electronics & Communication, I.T.M, Gorakhpur, India
Alok Gardia: Faculty of Education, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
Deepa Mehta: Faculty of Education, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
ORCID
Ikhlas Ahmad 0009-0007-8628-4014
Mohammad Zafar Ayat 0009-0002-1539-3460
Rabiya Khatoon 0009-0000-7991-665X
Alok Gardia 0009-0005-6982-7203
Deepa Mehta 0009-0007-5427-3775
Specific Learning Disability (SLD) is increasingly understood as an issue of educational equity rather than merely an individual academic difficulty. In India, the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, recognizes SLD and provides for inclusive education, reasonable accommodation, and appropriate academic support. Muslim educational participation has been shaped by socio-economic disadvantage, unequal institutional opportunities, and regional disparities. This article examines the intersection of minority status and learning disability through secondary data analysis and policy review. The study draws on the All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE), Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+), Census of India, National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, RPwD Act, University Grants Commission (UGC) guidelines, and relevant peer-reviewed literature. The review identifies persistent challenges, including delayed diagnosis, stigma, limited disclosure, inaccessible assessment practices, inadequate faculty awareness, and fragmented institutional support. Although AISHE data indicate growth in Muslim higher-education enrollment, UDISE+ data reveal declining Muslim representation between primary and higher-secondary education. These trends do not establish a causal relationship between minority status and disability or indicate higher SLD prevalence among Muslims. Instead, they highlight the need to address overlapping educational barriers. The article proposes an integrated framework encompassing minority inclusion, disability rights, reasonable accommodation, inclusive pedagogy, mentoring, assistive technology, grievance redressal, and institutional monitoring. It argues that educational equity requires institutions to move beyond admission and ensure meaningful participation, progression, achievement, and the fulfillment of educational aspirations.
Keywords
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License . Free to read, share, and adapt with attribution.
British Journal of Contemporary Research
Open Access · Peer Reviewed · Published by Bexford Publishing Ltd
Browse All Issues