ISSN 2979-8582 · Article No. 023
Prof. Dr. Harendra Singh: D.P.M. (P.G.) Institute of Education, Behsuma, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, U.P, India
The landscape of quality assurance in Bhartiya higher education has undergone a significant transformation over the past three decades, evolving from periodic accreditation to continuous, evidence-based institutional quality enhancement. This transition has been driven by the establishment of the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), the introduction of the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF), and the proposed reforms under the NAAC 2.0 framework aligned with the objectives of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. While NAAC has traditionally emphasized institutional quality through criterion-based accreditation, NIRF evaluates comparative institutional performance using standardized indicators related to teaching, research, graduation outcomes, outreach, and perception. The emerging NAAC 2.0 framework represents a paradigm shift by introducing a Binary Accreditation Framework, Maturity-Based Graded Levels, artificial intelligence-enabled assessment, continuous monitoring, and evidence-driven evaluation. This paper critically examines the evolution, objectives, methodologies, and policy implications of these three quality assurance mechanisms and analyses their complementary roles in fostering institutional excellence. Adopting a qualitative comparative policy analysis based on official policy documents, accreditation manuals, and recent scholarly literature, the study explores how these frameworks collectively promote accountability, governance, innovation, research productivity, learner-centric education, and global competitiveness. The paper argues that Bharat's quality assurance ecosystem is transitioning from compliance-oriented evaluation towards a culture of continuous improvement, institutional maturity, and measurable societal impact. It concludes that the effective integration of NIRF, NAAC, and NAAC 2.0 has the potential to strengthen higher education governance, enhance institutional resilience, and position Bhartiya universities more competitively within the global knowledge economy while supporting the transformative vision of NEP 2020.
Keywords
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License . Free to read, share, and adapt with attribution.
British Journal of Contemporary Research
Open Access · Peer Reviewed · Published by Bexford Publishing Ltd
Browse All Issues