Meta-Analysis

Restorative Justice v. Traditional Court: Measuring Effectiveness in Criminal Justice Outcomes in Nigeria

ISSN 2979-8582  ·  Article No. 014

Ahmed II, Jalaludeen Bala Aliyu Hussaini Abdul Ganiyi Abdurroheem Zubaedy

Publication Details

Publication Date
10/07/2026
Volume / Issue
Vol 1, Issue 2 (2026)
Article No.
014
Journal
British Journal of Contemporary Research
Received
22 Jun 2026
Views
2
Downloads
0
Affiliations

Ahmed II, Jalaludeen Bala: Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nigeria

Aliyu Hussaini: Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nigeria.

Abdul Ganiyi Abdurroheem Zubaedy: Department of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence, Faculty of Law, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nigeria

Abstract

The Nigerian criminal justice system has traditionally relied on adversarial court processes that emphasizes punishment, deterrence and retribution as primary responses to criminal behavior which has led to congested court dockets, lengthy trial period and overcrowded correctional facilities. Recently, however, restorative justice has emerged as an alternative framework that seeks to repair harm through victim-centered approach, accountability, community participation, reconciliation and reparation. Restorative justice is an approach to justice that focuses on repairing harm, promoting healing and rebuilding relationships between victims, offenders and the community, thus, preventing future harm by addressing the root causes of crime and criminal behavior, empowering the victim of crime and strengthening communal harmony. This study therefore evaluates key indicators of effectiveness, including recidivism rates, victim satisfaction, offender rehabilitation, cost efficiency procedural fairness and overall community restoration. The research adopted the doctrinal or library based method of research by relying on both primary and secondary sources of materials. The research argues that while traditional courts remain indispensable in addressing serious crimes and safeguarding due process, restorative justice mechanisms often produce superior outcomes in promoting offender accountability, victim healing and long term social integration. The research found that restorative justice holds the potential to effectively address many of the major concerns that bedevils the Nigerian justice sector. This research contributed to the ongoing debate on the suitability of restorative justice in Nigeria’s criminal justice system and highlighted the benefits of integrating restorative justice practices. The study recommended both policy and practice reforms aimed at enhancing access to justice, promoting community safety and improving the overall effectiveness of Nigeria’s criminal justice sector.

Keywords

Restorative Justice Traditional Court Criminal.

License

CC BY 4.0

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License . Free to read, share, and adapt with attribution.

Cite This Article

Ahmed II, Jalaludeen Bala, Aliyu Hussaini, Abdul Ganiyi Abdurroheem Zubaedy (2026). Restorative Justice v. Traditional Court: Measuring Effectiveness in Criminal Justice Outcomes in Nigeria. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(2), Article 014.
Ahmed II, Jalaludeen Bala. “Restorative Justice v. Traditional Court: Measuring Effectiveness in Criminal Justice Outcomes in Nigeria.” British Journal of Contemporary Research, vol. 1, no. 2, 2026.
Ahmed II, Jalaludeen Bala. “Restorative Justice v. Traditional Court: Measuring Effectiveness in Criminal Justice Outcomes in Nigeria.” British Journal of Contemporary Research 1, no. 2.

Metadata

ISSN 2979-8582
Tracking ID BEX_JUN_26_095

British Journal of Contemporary Research

Open Access · Peer Reviewed · Published by Bexford Publishing Ltd

Browse All Issues
Join Community