ISSN 2979-8582 · Article No. 024
Priyambada Palai: Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha , India
Rajshree Dutta: Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha
Suryakant Rout: Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha
ORCID
Priyambada Palai 0009-0006-4833-3631
Rajshree Dutta 0000-0001-7417-5864
Suryakant Rout 0009-0009-0434-1877
One of the most important rights is enshrined in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution which deals mainly with the protection of individual rights and dignity. It applies to both citizens and non-citizens. This paper explores the role of judicial activism in the expansion of the right to life and individual freedom. The analysis shows how the judiciary has expanded Article 21 from a narrowly defined right to a broad guarantee including privacy, education, health, livelihood, dignity and a clean environment. The study uses a qualitative research method and relies on secondary sources, such as constitutional provisions, important Supreme Court judgements, books, and Articles. It also discusses the role of Parliament in the development of these rights through the use of judicial activism, constitutionalism and separation of powers. The findings of this study have concluded that when the legislature was inactive, the judiciary steps in through judicial activism, which in some extend violate the principle of democracy. However, in order to maintain constitutional equilibrium and to protect democratic principles, the involvement of legislature is essential for the protection of fundamental rights.
Keywords
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License . Free to read, share, and adapt with attribution.
British Journal of Contemporary Research
Open Access · Peer Reviewed · Published by Bexford Publishing Ltd
Browse All Issues