This essay reads Jeet Thayil’s Narcopolis (2012) through Jasbir Puar’s concept of debility to investigate how the novel constructs marginal bodies and the urban space of postcolonial Bombay as sites of injury, bodily deterioration and state neglect. While there is a significant scholarship on the novel’s representation of addiction and urban decay, this essay argues that the central concern of the novel is that of state-sanctioned manufacture of debilitated lives through layers of intentional marginalisation like poverty, gendered violence and environmental toxicity. Employing Puar’s debility, Achille Mbembe’s necropolitics and Rob Nixon’s slow violence, the essay introduces the primary setting, Shuklaji Street, as a liminal political space between being made to live and being made to die. The essay critically looks at how the novel’s form – fragmented chronology, stream-of-consciousness narration, and syntactic disintegration – reproduces this condition of temporal and bodily erosion. Using critical discourse analysis, the essay reveals how the novel's language reveals the structural erasure of agency in these bodies. Dimple’s gender-nonconforming and repeatedly injured body further demonstrates how debility is produced through the intersection of gender, sexuality, poverty, and addiction. Finally, the essay reads Rashid’s opium den and Bombay itself as debilitated spaces, arguing that the den functions as a heterotopian infrastructure in which bodies excluded from normative regimes of productivity can temporarily coexist. Ultimately, it argues that debility is not an individual pathology but a structural and aesthetic condition where survival itself is an extended form of institutional violence.