<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="en"
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BJCR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">British Journal of Contemporary Research</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">BJCR</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn>2979-8582</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Bexford Publishing Ltd</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc><uri>https://bexfordpublishing.co.uk</uri></publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">BEX_SEP_26_129</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.67693/BJCR-LZ9B4HPW</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group xml:lang="en" subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="en">Ecofeminist Resistance and the Politics of Survival in the Selected Works of Kamala Markandaya, Indira Goswami, and Sara Joseph</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
      <contrib corresp="yes">
        <name-alternatives>
          <name name-style="western" specific-use="primary">
            <given-names>Manjeet Kaur</given-names>
          </name>
        </name-alternatives>
        <email>kaur30051991@gmail.com</email>
        <bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD Research Scholar Government Degree College Pati, Uttarakhand, India</p></bio>
      </contrib>
      <contrib>
        <name-alternatives>
          <name name-style="western" specific-use="primary">
            <given-names>Dr. Dharm Veer Singh</given-names>
          </name>
        </name-alternatives>
        <email>tomardharmveersingh428@gmail.com</email>
        <bio xml:lang="en"><p>ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3467-5887 | English, SSJU Almora, Government Degree College Pati</p></bio>
      </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="epub">
        <day>10</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      
      
      <pub-history>
        <event event-type="received">
          <event-desc>Received: <date date-type="received">
            <day>16</day>
            <month>09</month>
            <year>2026</year>
          </date></event-desc>
        </event>
        
        <event event-type="accepted">
          <event-desc>Accepted: <date date-type="accepted">
            <day>22</day>
            <month>09</month>
            <year>2026</year>
          </date></event-desc>
        </event>
      </pub-history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Manjeet Kaur</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">
          <license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract><p>Ecofeminism offers a critical framework for examining the interconnected oppression of women and the exploitation of the natural world. Within Indian literature, this relationship becomes especially visible in narratives where women’s lives are shaped by land, water, agriculture, animals, poverty, and systems of social power. This paper examines ecofeminist resistance and the politics of survival in Kamala Markandaya’s Nectar in a Sieve, Indira Goswami’s The Moth-Eaten Howdah of the Tusker, and Sara Joseph’s Gift in Green. Although the three novels emerge from different linguistic, regional, and cultural contexts, they converge on questions of gender, ecology, poverty, patriarchy, economic exploitation, and community survival. Markandaya represents Rukmani’s struggle with agrarian insecurity, drought, hunger, poverty, and industrial transformation; Goswami associates women’s restricted lives with the exploitation and symbolic captivity of animals; and Joseph foregrounds the destruction of land and water and the emergence of collective ecological resistance. The paper argues that survival in these texts should not be understood merely as passive endurance. Rather, everyday acts of care, persistence, memory, dignity, and community protection can become forms of resistance to structures of domination. Through a comparative ecofeminist reading, the study demonstrates that environmental justice and gender justice are closely interconnected and that literary representations of women’s survival can illuminate wider struggles over land, resources, power, and ecological belonging.</p></abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body/>
</article>