Abstract: The history of bridge construction in India cannot be understood simply as a transition from indigenous traditional structures to modern European engineering during the colonial period. Long before the construction of large iron and steel bridges, Indian builders developed diverse techniques for crossing rivers and difficult terrain, including timber beam bridges, cantilever bridges, rope and cane suspension bridges, stone structures, masonry bridges and pontoon bridges. These technologies were closely adapted to local materials, environmental conditions and patterns of mobility. During the nineteenth century, British colonial rule introduced new engineering institutions, railway technology, iron and steel construction, mathematical design and standardised methods. However, earlier bridge-building practices did not disappear completely. Some survived, some were modified, and others interacted with emerging colonial engineering practices. This article examines the relationship between indigenous bridge-building traditions and colonial engineering through selected examples, including the Kashmir kadals, Himalayan jhula bridges, the Puri/Madhupur stone bridge, the Lansdowne Bridge and the Howrah Bridge. It argues that colonial transformation involved neither complete technological replacement nor a simple continuation of indigenous practice. Instead, it produced a layered process of technological adaptation, institutional standardisation, material transformation and selective continuity. The history of Indian bridges therefore demonstrates how indigenous knowledge, colonial engineering, Indian labour and industrial technology interacted in the making of modern infrastructure.