<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="en"
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BJCR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">British Journal of Contemporary Research</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">BJCR</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn>2979-8582</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Bexford Publishing Ltd</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc><uri>https://bexfordpublishing.co.uk</uri></publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">BEX_OCT_26_239</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.67693/BJCR-ZYZY9QWD</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group xml:lang="en" subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="en">From Khmer Independence to Act East Policy: Civilizational Narratives, Cultural Diplomacy, and the Transformation of India-Cambodia Relations</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
      <contrib corresp="yes">
        <name-alternatives>
          <name name-style="western" specific-use="primary">
            <given-names>Chea  Chanrithy</given-names>
          </name>
        </name-alternatives>
        <email>cheachanrithy88@gmail.com</email>
        <bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Political Science, University of Delhi, India</p></bio>
      </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="epub">
        <day>10</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      
      
      <pub-history>
        <event event-type="received">
          <event-desc>Received: <date date-type="received">
            <day>26</day>
            <month>10</month>
            <year>2026</year>
          </date></event-desc>
        </event>
        
        <event event-type="accepted">
          <event-desc>Accepted: <date date-type="accepted">
            <day>31</day>
            <month>10</month>
            <year>2026</year>
          </date></event-desc>
        </event>
      </pub-history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Chea  Chanrithy</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">
          <license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract><p>Abstract
This article chronicles the evolution of India-Cambodia relations from Cambodian
independence from the implementation of India&#039;s Act East Policy. It posits that shared
Civilizational narratives have transcended static inheritances or ornamental
claims. Instead, they have served as a versatile diplomatic instrument, enabling political
leaders, religious figures, conservators, educators, and cultural institutions to interpret
bilateral relations in response to evolving regional dynamics. A historical-interpretive
analysis of scholarly works, official statements, bilateral agreements, and heritage records
identifies five overlapping phases: the adaptation of Indic cultural forms in pre-modern
Cambodia: post-independence solidarity and non-alignment; the rupture and selective
continuity during the Cambodian conflicts; the recognition, reconstruction, and heritage
conservation efforts post-Khmer Rouge regime and the institutionalization of cultural
diplomacy through the Look East and Act East policies. The article underscores that
India&#039;s recognition of the People&#039;s Republic of Kampuchea and its conservation initiatives
at Angkor Wat and Ta Prohm fostered exceptionally enduring political goodwill. Under
the Act East policy, this historical capital has been integrated into capacity building,
development cooperation, ASEAN-led institutions, tourism, education, and limited
security engagement. However, civilizational affinity alone has not automatically led to
high levels of trade, sustained connectivity, or decisive strategic influence. Consequently,
The relationship should be understood best as one of asymmetrical complementarity:
Culture provides trust and legitimacy, while material cooperation determines the
sustainability of that trust as an enduring interdependence. The article concludes that
Future cooperation must be based on Cambodian agency, co-created historical knowledge, living heritage, human-capital networks, and practical connectivity, not
origin-based narratives of Indianization.
Keywords: India-Cambodia relations, Act East Policy, civilizational narratives,
cultural diplomacy, heritage diplomacy, soft power</p></abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body/>
</article>