<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="en"
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BJCR</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">British Journal of Contemporary Research</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">BJCR</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn>2979-8582</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Bexford Publishing Ltd</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc><uri>https://bexfordpublishing.co.uk</uri></publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">BEX_JUL_26_033</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.67693/BJCR-HN44R4GT</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group xml:lang="en" subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="en">Nigeria&#039;s Official Secrets Act, 1962: Assessing the Continued Relevance of a Colonial-Era Secrecy Law</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
      <contrib corresp="yes">
        <name-alternatives>
          <name name-style="western" specific-use="primary">
            <given-names>Dr Henry Okolie Onyebuolise</given-names>
          </name>
        </name-alternatives>
        <email>henryosem@gmail.com</email>
        <bio xml:lang="en"><p>Law, Delta State University Abraka, Nigeria, ²Law,Southern Delta University Ozoro, Nigeria</p></bio>
      </contrib>
      <contrib>
        <name-alternatives>
          <name name-style="western" specific-use="primary">
            <given-names>Dr Kenneth Owighose Odhe</given-names>
          </name>
        </name-alternatives>
        <email>kennethodhe@gmail.com</email>
        <bio xml:lang="en"><p>Law/Law/Southern Delta University Ozoro</p></bio>
      </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="epub">
        <day>10</day>
        <month>08</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      
      
      <pub-history>
        <event event-type="received">
          <event-desc>Received: <date date-type="received">
            <day>05</day>
            <month>07</month>
            <year>2026</year>
          </date></event-desc>
        </event>
        
        <event event-type="accepted">
          <event-desc>Accepted: <date date-type="accepted">
            <day>05</day>
            <month>08</month>
            <year>2026</year>
          </date></event-desc>
        </event>
      </pub-history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Dr Henry Okolie Onyebuolise</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">
          <license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract><p>The Official Secrets Act of 1962 serves as Nigeria&#039;s main legal structure for safeguarding  government information, but it is infrequently implemented through criminal charges. The confidentialarticle explores the assertion that the Act is an inactive piece of legislation by tracing its colonial roots, evaluating its main provisions and penalties, and reviewing its usage since independence. It contends that although the Act is regularly used administratively and as a justification for rejecting requests for freedom of information, the discrepancy between its wide application and its scant prosecutorial use leads to legal ambiguity and compromises openness. The study assesses the implications of this dormancy for accountability, journalistic freedom, and national security using legislative analysis, documented examples, and the conflict between the Act and the Freedom of Information Act. It concludes by exploring potential reform strategies, such as implementing a public interest defense and ensuring consistency with both constitutional and international standards</p></abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body/>
</article>